Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
18
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 00:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Tuxford wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:CCP Tuxford wrote:Two step wrote:Sounds pretty neat. One issue: Using the API, people can tell when stuff is missing from silos. Has this been thought about? Yes we did. We do track how much is siphoned from what and where it would end up and the API then reports those numbers. It's a bit evil abusing the API in this way but I think it's for the good of the feature. Will a player or program, using the API, be able to tell if a siphon is on their POS or not? Not. The API will lie about the content. Sorry thought that was clear.
Well that quite frankly is pants on head and set on fire stupid. What is the point of the API if the data isn't correct? Also, if something seems like it might not be balanced as one dev noted, how about you don't release it until it is balanced?
Come to think of this, how about CCP stops and thinks for 3 micro seconds about this? I see above people talking about POS's being easy money and requiring about 3 minutes work. Only someone who doesn't manage a POS and hasn't spent the endless hours, waiting to online a POS and the mods, handle to the logistics of the fuel, shuffled product between reaction towers would think this. Not to mention the time taken to conquer the space, clear dead POS's from the moon etc, etc, etc.
How about instead of mucking around giving talentless anti-social mouth breathers more tools to continue their crusade to measure their self worth in in game hate mail, CCP actually fixes POS interface, gameplay, flexibility and useability? Or will that be like balancing these siphons and happen after due time and review?
It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
18
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 09:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Neave LaFontaine wrote:Anyone else notice the high level of goon tears in this thread? You know, it never ceases to amaze me that with GSF up over 10,000 people, to say nothing of the rest of the CFC, people see a half-dozen goons pointing out blatantly obvious flaws in mechanics (and/or trolling the people who inevitably crop up to defend anything purely because the goons say it's not a good idea) and decide that's a 'high level of goon tears'. Really? One of the largest, most active groups in the game, with a history of delving into the mechanics of the game looking for the loopholes and problems CCP refuses to see until GSF goes ahead and rubs someone's nose in it, has multiple people posting in a thread about mechanics - the very same people who post on all of these mechanics threads, no less - and you think that's somehow significant?
Never underestimate the power of confirmation bias from the "elite PVP players who hate goons (which is most of them)" of eve. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Arrendis wrote:Neave LaFontaine wrote:Anyone else notice the high level of goon tears in this thread? You know, it never ceases to amaze me that with GSF up over 10,000 people, to say nothing of the rest of the CFC, people see a half-dozen goons pointing out blatantly obvious flaws in mechanics (and/or trolling the people who inevitably crop up to defend anything purely because the goons say it's not a good idea) and decide that's a 'high level of goon tears'. Really? One of the largest, most active groups in the game, with a history of delving into the mechanics of the game looking for the loopholes and problems CCP refuses to see until GSF goes ahead and rubs someone's nose in it, has multiple people posting in a thread about mechanics - the very same people who post on all of these mechanics threads, no less - and you think that's somehow significant? Never underestimate the power of confirmation bias from the "elite PVP players who hate goons (which is most of them)" of eve. Let me put this bluntly, in terms of Sov war the CFC is the elite of Eve.
Probably true. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 13:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP SoniClover wrote:Hey guys, thanks for all the good feedback. Couple of things we're contemplating:
a) reduce waste factor from 20% to 10%
b) have a character limit on how many siphons you can deploy (i.e. have in space at the same time). This would probably be in the 5 to 10 range.
Let me know what you think.
a) is neither here nor there, wastage factors only effect those who empty the siphon, nominally the deployer but arguably anyone, including the POS owner, i note few have complained about it in this thread, ergo, no one really cares.
b) a marginal improvement, it won't stop an army of alts deploying them.
Your answer fails to address issues of balance.
The modules should be bigger, over 200m3, they should not fit in an interceptor. In their current form they are near risk free for the griefers who can load several of them up in a nulli interceptor and blast past defensive gate camps with near impunity.
Cost, 10m isk is too low and will merely encourage the Goons to spam them across regions of space, using the above nulli interceptors.
API false reporting, this idea is pants on head and set on fire level ******** especially with all the talk about the new Crest API, why go make a game mechanic to **** it up? Talk about the left hand not talking to the right hand.
Meanwhile, are any Devs working on improvements to POS mechanics and interface? It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 13:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lallante wrote:Helicity Boson wrote:ITT: Goons trying to prevent a tool being released in a form which will allow them to endlessly grief others. Others write it off as Goon tears in their ignorance.
This is a peculiar thread indeed. Sorry but goons are the single largest holder of high end moons. This is 100% about them protecting their income.
One should be careful when pointing out others ignorance.
Goons aren't the largest moon holders. Pandemic Legion would be the largest between their renter space and low sec moons.
The CFC might be the largest holder of R64s, but I am not convinced that is the case with N3 (including renters) holding more space than the CFC. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 14:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Benjamin Hamburg wrote:Tippia wrote:CCP SoniClover wrote:Let me know what you think. I think I still want to know what the design goal behind making the API lie is. It's about making it harder to detect it while you aren't logged in the game. Want to secure your POS? Go, and actually play EVE Online.
Well I do play eve, when I am not working, sleeping, being with my family or wanking. Albeit CCP seems to think I should be online monitoring my towers 23.5/7 now. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
20
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Miner Hottie wrote: Well I do play eve, when I am not working, sleeping, being with my family or wanking. Albeit CCP seems to think I should be online monitoring my towers 23.5/7 now.
not at all ccp thinks that you should only setup what you can afford to loose... just like a pimp mission ship. when i used to be active in 0.0 space (non npc) we would have people from australia to america who were pretty much online all day. they would be busy ratting/plexing/mining/scaning and would notice if a nuet/red came into system all they would have to do now is after said red leaves the system to do a spot check on the moon poses in system... you can use d-scan for this purpose perhaps you should get renters to occupy your moon system to monitor them for you... make it rent free as an instentive.
Ah yes, my corp and alliance mates will save the day! Why didn't I realise that before! It must be, hmm, let me think. Oh yeah, any self respecting ratter rats in the systems with the best sec status and does that correlate with most tower farms are? Hmm.. maybe it doesn't. Also, most PVE players tend to POS up the moment a neutral comes in system and they wander off to do something else until the the neural gets blue balled. I am quite certain they will happily run around the 20 to 50 odd moons in the average system to find a small and ****** bit of EHP to grind for no money. Makes perfect sense. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
20
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Miner Hottie wrote: Ah yes, my corp and alliance mates will save the day! Why didn't I realise that before! It must be, hmm, let me think. Oh yeah, any self respecting ratter rats in the systems with the best sec status and does that correlate with most tower farms are? Hmm.. maybe it doesn't. Also, most PVE players tend to POS up the moment a neutral comes in system and they wander off to do something else until the the neural gets blue balled. I am quite certain they will happily run around the 20 to 50 odd moons in the average system to find a small and ****** bit of EHP to grind for no money. Makes perfect sense.
you have heard of providence right? terrible true sec but filled with ratters. and yes if you provide free rent to null bears they will be more then happy to patrol the system for you. (i know i would if i were offered the system rent free) hell just say to the renter if any moon goo is lost you have to pay me the difference. plus d-scan will help reduce the amount of posses you have to fly too. (though those pesky systems with 20 moons around one planet will be a ***** to partrol) moreover good true sec is usually taken by the host alliance and not the renters. so its logical to just shift some renters to key systems that hold r64-r32 moons. also you can let the renter know which moons to monitor. (afaik there are limited amount of r64 moons... are there any systems where you have multiple r64 moons? or is it more one r64 max per system?) think of it as an oppurtunity to fill 0.0 with bears that then can be hunted and provide fun between strat ops.
Now I think I understand why you're in a NPC corp.
It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
20
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Miner Hottie wrote: Now I think I understand why you're in a NPC corp.
yes my jita price check and cyno alt is in a npc corp... do you have a valid point to make or just stating it as an observation.
Expressing my understanding of your point and position. Don't agree with it, but eh, CCP is determined to ignore us and implement this and then they will nerf it to oblivion once goons complete the cycle of deliberate abuse that has started now that they have warned CCP about it being OP. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 23:12:00 -
[10] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Expressing my understanding of your point and position. Don't agree with it, but eh, CCP is determined to ignore us and implement this and then they will nerf it to oblivion once goons complete the cycle of deliberate abuse that has started now that they have warned CCP about it being OP. Oh you noticed the cycle ... Still working on drone assist, it appears they are PERFECTLY BALANCED and cannot be abused
I didn't imply with this comment that CCP were in any way shape or form, on the ball in dealing with the "Goon Broken Feature Cycle of Abuse" It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 23:38:00 -
[11] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:i am starting a new sevice... i call it siphon squad... i will personally monitor your poses for siphons. my only charge is erotic dancers, fedos and a nude photo of bea Arthur.
I don't want my breakfast anymore..... It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 23:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Expressing my understanding of your point and position. Don't agree with it, but eh, CCP is determined to ignore us and implement this and then they will nerf it to oblivion once goons complete the cycle of deliberate abuse that has started now that they have warned CCP about it being OP. Oh you noticed the cycle ... Still working on drone assist, it appears they are PERFECTLY BALANCED and cannot be abused I didn't imply with this comment that CCP were in any way shape or form, on the ball in dealing with the "Goon Broken Feature Cycle of Abuse" If they were the features wouldn' be released in an abuseably broken manner. But they aren't, and thus we can have fun. GOON TEARRSSSSSSSSS
Just you like you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink, you can tell a CCP Dev that they have ****** up, but you won't make them budget for the time needed to fix the problem in the next patch round.
It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 23:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: Supposedly you can feed the horse salt, but in such cases it's more like rubbing salt on the wound
Funnily enough, in the 8th to 14th centuries salt was nearly as valuable as gold throughout Europe due to the fact that it was a limited resource which when fed to stock increased the animals size, the animals couldn't get enough salt from the land, hence it was mined in what is now Switzerland and traded down the Rhine an Danube rivers. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 00:12:00 -
[14] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote: Supposedly you can feed the horse salt, but in such cases it's more like rubbing salt on the wound
Funnily enough, in the 8th to 14th centuries salt was nearly as valuable as gold throughout Europe due to the fact that it was a limited resource which when fed to stock increased the animals size, the animals couldn't get enough salt from the land, hence it was mined in what is now Switzerland and traded down the Rhine an Danube rivers. Yeah, livestock need to get minerals and so on, usually delivered in what is called a mineral lick. Salt and other things are very important for growth and health.
Not really relevant to these discussions, but fascinating history for sure. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
23
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 00:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Our salt-containing tears, that is.
I completely forgot that tears are salty, so not only do pubbie tears nourish the soul, they also feed the body. Totally relevant. My mistake. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
24
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 06:30:00 -
[16] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:CCP SoniClover wrote:Hey guys, thanks for all the good feedback. Couple of things we're contemplating:
a) reduce waste factor from 20% to 10%
b) have a character limit on how many siphons you can deploy (i.e. have in space at the same time). This would probably be in the 5 to 10 range.
Let me know what you think. Can you add a limit on the number of POS you can maintain too?...  Also if you are so dead set on having waste you should have made it vent into space as small moon rocks that can be probed down or something that disappear in 30 days. Go to a belt, planet or something and behold, Technetium oil spill from a nearby moon...
Sure you can have a POS limit, when CCP allows personal POS instead then being tied to corps. Oh, wait that would require fiddling with old code that makes the devs soil their underwear when they look at it. Guess they will just go screw around with faked API data feeds instead, what could possibly go wrong? It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
25
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 10:36:00 -
[17] - Quote
Fenrix Mernher wrote:The amount of posturing and whining by goons in this thread shows how good an idea it is.
Fry has some thoughts for you. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
25
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 11:28:00 -
[18] - Quote
Fenrix Mernher wrote:"ablooblooblooooo my precious afk moon money"
It'll be good for the game, vast empty passages of space should have vulnerable resource streams.
Others in this thread have already explained to your fellow low sloping foreheads why POS's aren't AFK income, but I doubt you understood it. Just like I doubt you'll understand what will happen when goons unleash this on everyone else. Anyway, as a member of the elite N3 coalition, why don't you form a fleet and conquer those valuable streams of income then?
Or is it too far below your elite self to engage in a structure bash? Reffed POS earns no income right now, no need for little sythons. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
27
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 14:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
Fenrix Mernher wrote:Siobhan Teregone wrote:Fenrix Mernher wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Fenrix Mernher wrote:"ablooblooblooooo my precious afk moon money"
It'll be good for the game, vast empty passages of space should have vulnerable resource streams. Others in this thread have already explained to your fellow low sloping foreheads why POS's aren't AFK income, but I doubt you understood it. Just like I doubt you'll understand what will happen when goons unleash this on everyone else. Anyway, as a member of the elite N3 coalition, why don't you form a fleet and conquer those valuable streams of income then? Or is it too far below your elite self to engage in a structure bash? Reffed POS earns no income right now, no need for little sythons. I know exactly what will happen when 'goons unleash this on everybody else'. There'll be smaller fights on mining poses which won't have been pinged for days on end and will have a spontaneity to them which will be refreshing for the average F1 masher like myself. Reffing a pos requires a fairly heavy commitment of subcaps, I could drop/pick up/destroy a bunch of siphons with some newbros in a bunch of cruisers and hope there's a brawl with the locals as I do so. Sounds much more fun to my mind. You are assuming that griefing will include trying to harvest the goo rather than just ejecting it and trashing it using mainly afk cloaky bombers. There won't be fights .. just griefing to make the pos fuel costs more expensive than the successful ore harvest. My heart bleeds for you.
Pleased to see your education is proceeding at about the pace expected of you. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
28
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 17:12:00 -
[20] - Quote
Gospadin wrote:Jeanne Hilanen wrote:Weaselior wrote:Rakshasa Taisab wrote: With so many thousands of people, don't you have people flying through the space in which you have POS'es?
Oh... right...
Yes. We do. Those thousands of people are never on grid with a mining pos because they have no reason to be. That's my point. Those thousands of people, using our space, do not actually provide any meaningful advantage over an alt left logged out in the tower. What a bunch of bullshit. it takes less than a minute to dscan check a system. If you have people actually LIVING in a system, you can very quickly spot these +1 Seriously, if an alliance of hundreds or thousands of players can't be bothered to put 1 alliance character in each system they own once every 3-4 hours, you deserve to lose the goo. It takes seconds to scan and move on (especially with the warp changes), and you only have to get within 14AU to know if they're there. A single char could check an entire region's moons in under 30 minutes.
That is one pathetically small region with tiny solar systems in it. Where is this mythical region of space? It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
30
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:59:00 -
[21] - Quote
Fix Lag wrote:Ereshgikal wrote:Close thread please. Just same 4 characters repeating what they said 5 posts ago.
Edit: Or you can implement a proper "ignore" function on these #&!"#-ñ& forums. get out
And please play outside, the adults are conversing with the Mormon Missionaries. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
30
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 02:31:00 -
[22] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:So reality is; pos siphons will be used to shut down the small operators while those with most of the decent moons remain pretty much untouchable and are very likely to actually profit from this whole thing..
Well done CCP, you've given the major power blocks another foot hold on total domination of eve. By siphons being a real mechanic in the game, means it will create player traffic. This means the opportunity for combat increases. Any POS operators that rely on some 3rd party tool to play the game for them will be the ones to suffer the most. Any groups that actually inhabit the space they have POS in will be just fine as they will have eyes in the system to see when a siphon is deployed. I can't believe how heavily some groups rely on programs to play the game for them and go out of their way to make sure AFK game play and mechanics remain a thing for EVE. Pathetic.
Except the siphon griefers will be in nulli interceptors or stabbed blockade runners or cloaky recons, generating rather indifferent volumes of combat. I also love they way you seem to think moon mining is AFK. I reckon a survey on player burn out in Eve would show two groups with the highest level of burn out being CEOs and POS monkeys, with FCs possibly being up there as well.
I also find it ironic that a senior figure in NC., which has substantially outsourced the act living its own space, i.e. has gone beyond being AFK in its own space, is chastising people for running POS, which it thinks is AFK. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
30
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 02:33:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ereshgikal wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Fix Lag wrote:Ereshgikal wrote:Close thread please. Just same 4 characters repeating what they said 5 posts ago.
Edit: Or you can implement a proper "ignore" function on these #&!"#-ñ& forums. get out And please play outside, the adults are conversing with the Mormon Missionaries. Thank you for pointing out one of the reasons why Eve-O forums are shite.
Eve-O forums aren't that bad, I have seen worse, no I won't link, I am not that terrible a human being. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
31
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 03:44:00 -
[24] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:So reality is; pos siphons will be used to shut down the small operators while those with most of the decent moons remain pretty much untouchable and are very likely to actually profit from this whole thing..
Well done CCP, you've given the major power blocks another foot hold on total domination of eve. By siphons being a real mechanic in the game, means it will create player traffic. This means the opportunity for combat increases. Any POS operators that rely on some 3rd party tool to play the game for them will be the ones to suffer the most. Any groups that actually inhabit the space they have POS in will be just fine as they will have eyes in the system to see when a siphon is deployed. I can't believe how heavily some groups rely on programs to play the game for them and go out of their way to make sure AFK game play and mechanics remain a thing for EVE. Pathetic. Except the siphon griefers will be in nulli interceptors or stabbed blockade runners or cloaky recons, generating rather indifferent volumes of combat. I also love they way you seem to think moon mining is AFK. I reckon a survey on player burn out in Eve would show two groups with the highest level of burn out being CEOs and POS monkeys, with FCs possibly being up there as well. I also find it ironic that a senior figure in NC., which has substantially outsourced the act living its own space, i.e. has gone beyond being AFK in its own space, is chastising people for running POS, which it thinks is AFK. It's ironic, but so are your tears. HOWEVER, I do hear that, in the name of CONTENT, the CFC's blackops pilots are living in the ncdor renter space. SO it is in fact lived in, and quite active in terms of pvp
True, but I doubt Marlona would know about that seeing as his AFK from his space.
It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
34
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 15:24:00 -
[25] - Quote
Vyktor Abyss wrote:So many stupids talking about the API "lying to them".
It is absolutely moronic to think someone performing a type of in game covert sabotage against your corporation IN GAME should actually be flagged up nice and easily OUT OF GAME via API just to make your lives easier.
With whines like that it is no wonder everyone is trolling you - The question is: Is there really any reason Corp structures etc need to even be included in the API in the first place? (It is done to make life easier for POS folks, not to do half the maintenance work for them).
Tools already exist for POS fuelling via the in game calander, notifications are sent via mail in game for fuel, or when it is attacked, even when some random puts a tower up in your Sov etc... I'd argue for a much harsher Eve without even the in game help for POS operators - and that players who can't be bothered to even log in to manage and maintain their Eve POS empires don't deserve those empires in the first place.
Right now CCP panders completely for the lazy community - adding any 'syphon warning' via the API would be a massive mistake.
And so many eve online subscribers demonstrating there incredible absence of knowledge thinking POSs are easy and AFK, that POS monkeys are lazy and are pandered to by CCP. CSM actions and consequently the Devs were told here what those lazy POS monkeys' thought about that sort of attitude "I am a small portion of the eve community" note the 143 pages of comment on why CCP not fixing POS interface and mechanics and security was not good.
If CCP was to be considered to be pandering to anyone truly lazy, it would be cloaky AFKers. I mean, how little effort do they put into their gameplay? Think further, how ironic would it be if someone combined an AFK cloaky with these siphons to steal moon goo? How could that not be described as lazy gameplay?
On the matter of the API, yes diddling the API so it reports false information, what could be wrong with that? I guess those people using Evemon, Eve Fitting Tool, Pyfa they are all lazy as well I suppose, bad API feeds wouldn't bother them would it? It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 00:13:00 -
[26] - Quote
Herr Esiq wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:On the matter of the API, yes diddling the API so it reports false information, what could be wrong with that? I guess those people using Evemon, Eve Fitting Tool, Pyfa they are all lazy as well I suppose, bad API feeds wouldn't bother them would it? And you can"t see the difference between a 'personal character monitor' and a 'automated alliance tool that monotors a complete empire like HAL 9000'. You really cant can you?
Hmm, let me think about that for a moment. Yeah, no quite sure Mittens doesn't have such a tool, I mean I am sure Digi would LOVE such a tool in his never ending quest to find spies. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 00:32:00 -
[27] - Quote
Vyktor Abyss wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Vyktor Abyss wrote:So many stupids talking about the API "lying to them".
It is absolutely moronic to think someone performing a type of in game covert sabotage against your corporation IN GAME should actually be flagged up nice and easily OUT OF GAME via API just to make your lives easier.
With whines like that it is no wonder everyone is trolling you - The question is: Is there really any reason Corp structures etc need to even be included in the API in the first place? (It is done to make life easier for POS folks, not to do half the maintenance work for them).
Tools already exist for POS fuelling via the in game calander, notifications are sent via mail in game for fuel, or when it is attacked, even when some random puts a tower up in your Sov etc... I'd argue for a much harsher Eve without even the in game help for POS operators - and that players who can't be bothered to even log in to manage and maintain their Eve POS empires don't deserve those empires in the first place.
Right now CCP panders completely for the lazy community - adding any 'syphon warning' via the API would be a massive mistake. And so many eve online subscribers demonstrating there incredible absence of knowledge thinking POSs are easy and AFK, that POS monkeys are lazy and are pandered to by CCP. CSM actions and consequently the Devs were told here what those lazy POS monkeys' thought about that sort of attitude "I am a small portion of the eve community" note the 143 pages of comment on why CCP not fixing POS interface and mechanics and security was not good. If CCP was to be considered to be pandering to anyone truly lazy, it would be cloaky AFKers. I mean, how little effort do they put into their gameplay? Think further, how ironic would it be if someone combined an AFK cloaky with these siphons to steal moon goo? How could that not be described as lazy gameplay? On the matter of the API, yes diddling the API so it reports false information, what could be wrong with that? I guess those people using Evemon, Eve Fitting Tool, Pyfa they are all lazy as well I suppose, bad API feeds wouldn't bother them would it? You are being obtuse. GÇó It is accepted that a moon mining POS is AFK income, as in it accrues materials while you are offline - so you are wrong. GÇó You assume others have no knowledge of POS managment because they disagree with your whines - you are wrong (I have ran a POS network of 15 POS solo and know the issues and pain of doing so). GÇó You are crying about Eve Fitting tool other API tools/data that have nothing to do with syphons and their (lack of) impact on the API - it just shows how obtuse you are being. GÇó You are apparently delibrately confusing Two Steps suggestions (dead horse POS rework) with supporting your own agenda about syphons - Just because POS owners (myself included) badly want a rework of the mechanics in a threadnaught about POS mechanics doesn't mean they agree with you about syphons. GÇó AFK Cloak whine - Stop talking rubbish about AFK cloaking laziness, you are being stupid and should go post in the relevant thread about that. Fact is the API tool is useful for helping people do stuff out of game with the tools designed by players. These tools should NOT give an in game advantage, which is what some player designed 'syphon alert' system would do if POS syphoning appeared via the API.
Not obtuse at all. You just don't like me knocking your points over.
*the income from POS is only earned, collected, when you get it to market, the POS accumulates materials you can sell over time. However, like any ship you undock, you must assume it can be lost at any time unless it is in a station. Before you whine at me about that, I am an accountant in real life and moon goo in a POS would not be classified as income earned on accounting grounds. As the risk and reward of the moon goo has not substantially passed to the customer. *I linked a thread in which CCP devs didn't seem to get it, why should you? You stated you thought we were lazy. Now you say you know the pain of running POS. Which is it? Can't have it both ways. *No, just a broad example, obtuse means open angle by the way. Marketters, station industrialists, researchers all rely on API tools, none of them are getting there ring burnt by these changes, why not? Why shouldn't the API lie to them as well? *POS mechanics, interface and security all drive the way we interact with POS and contribute to the burn out people suffer from these things. Which CCP just decided wasn't enough without adding these unbalanced devices. *AFK Cloaky I have no issue with the mechanic itself, I do it myself at times. What I am quite certain is that it IS NOT ACTIVE GAME PLAY you moron. It is the most completely lazy game mode ever, which you seem to think I engage in lazy gameplay when managing my POS's, which you then is an issue and painful. Very confusing. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
37
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 00:23:00 -
[28] - Quote
Icesail wrote:Ganthrithor wrote:Look, here's the deal. Based on your own assumptions, it seems like you are the kind of player you keep talking about when you refer to "little guys" practicing "economic warfare." It seems like you don't have much experience playing with sizable groups of other players, and you may or may not have experience in nullsec at all. If you did have experience in nullsec, you'd know that:
- There's already room for small gangs to conduct economic warfare in hostile space. This is done by hunting and killing ratters, industrialists, random travelers, and basically anything else that floats through space alone or in small numbers. It can also be accomplished by doing nasty things like relisting: buying up in-demand commodities in nullsec stations (in their entirety where possible) and re-listing them at higher prices, forcing people to overpay for their ships and gear and funneling that profit into your own wallet.
- Nobody is going to hang around for days at a time in hopes of possibly catching some hostile in a blockade runner that's come to loot a siphon: it's absolutely not worth doing, since you can easily retrieve your stuff from the siphon and then destroy it rather than spending ~48 hours in a Sabre poopsocking a structure, hoping that you'll be watching the screen at the exact moment some fool decloaks their hauler for 3 seconds to do a drive-by pickup. It's seriously not going to happen. The spergiest of spergs can sometimes be motivated to camp things for days at a time in hopes of a cap or supercap kill, but nobody is going to bother to do so over a possible Prowler kill.
- Have you ever even been to nullsec? Let me give you a clue: your average nullsec resident is not very situationally aware. Someone running around planting siphons is just one more hostile drifting through a region: ratters will safe up momentarily until you leave, then go back to ratting. I've moved supercaps through null without being noticed, to think this won't be possible with a blockade runner dropping modules that leave no overt traces is ridiculous.
- This siphon proposal doesn't involve any "gameplay" at all: your use of that term in this discussion is overly-generous to CCP. Pushing a module out of your ship isn't gameplay any more than anchoring a drag bubble is. It's the stuff that happens as a result of anchoring a drag bubble that constitutes gameplay: siphons make no such promises.
1. There's always room for more economic warfare opportunities for the small gangs.. Get over it. 2. Nobody expects you to 'hang' around for days.. So it goes.. You lose some of your passive income. Find another revenue stream if you don't like it. 3. Don't pretend you're the Encyclopedia of nullsec.. The moon syphoning is another game mechanic you will need to accept and deal with instead of bitching about it. 4. your drag bubble analogy isn't accurate either. I shouldn't have to explain it for you further. EDIT: My apologies. My response was not meant as an attack on you. Let me rephrase it this way. All of your points are silly.
2. Passive income.... until one manages a moon or a reaction farm, one is not permitted to state if moon income is passive or not. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
42
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 05:03:00 -
[29] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Icesail wrote:Ganthrithor wrote:Look, here's the deal. Based on your own assumptions, it seems like you are the kind of player you keep talking about when you refer to "little guys" practicing "economic warfare." It seems like you don't have much experience playing with sizable groups of other players, and you may or may not have experience in nullsec at all. If you did have experience in nullsec, you'd know that:
- There's already room for small gangs to conduct economic warfare in hostile space. This is done by hunting and killing ratters, industrialists, random travelers, and basically anything else that floats through space alone or in small numbers. It can also be accomplished by doing nasty things like relisting: buying up in-demand commodities in nullsec stations (in their entirety where possible) and re-listing them at higher prices, forcing people to overpay for their ships and gear and funneling that profit into your own wallet.
- Nobody is going to hang around for days at a time in hopes of possibly catching some hostile in a blockade runner that's come to loot a siphon: it's absolutely not worth doing, since you can easily retrieve your stuff from the siphon and then destroy it rather than spending ~48 hours in a Sabre poopsocking a structure, hoping that you'll be watching the screen at the exact moment some fool decloaks their hauler for 3 seconds to do a drive-by pickup. It's seriously not going to happen. The spergiest of spergs can sometimes be motivated to camp things for days at a time in hopes of a cap or supercap kill, but nobody is going to bother to do so over a possible Prowler kill.
- Have you ever even been to nullsec? Let me give you a clue: your average nullsec resident is not very situationally aware. Someone running around planting siphons is just one more hostile drifting through a region: ratters will safe up momentarily until you leave, then go back to ratting. I've moved supercaps through null without being noticed, to think this won't be possible with a blockade runner dropping modules that leave no overt traces is ridiculous.
- This siphon proposal doesn't involve any "gameplay" at all: your use of that term in this discussion is overly-generous to CCP. Pushing a module out of your ship isn't gameplay any more than anchoring a drag bubble is. It's the stuff that happens as a result of anchoring a drag bubble that constitutes gameplay: siphons make no such promises.
1. There's always room for more economic warfare opportunities for the small gangs.. Get over it. 2. Nobody expects you to 'hang' around for days.. So it goes.. You lose some of your passive income. Find another revenue stream if you don't like it. 3. Don't pretend you're the Encyclopedia of nullsec.. The moon syphoning is another game mechanic you will need to accept and deal with instead of bitching about it. 4. your drag bubble analogy isn't accurate either. I shouldn't have to explain it for you further. EDIT: My apologies. My response was not meant as an attack on you. Let me rephrase it this way. All of your points are silly. 2. Passive income.... until one manages a moon or a reaction farm, one is not permitted to state if moon income is passive or not. 1. Syphons won't so much create economic warfare as passive income for those placing syphons.
Great enjoy emptying them every 25 hours, unless someone else empties it first. Passive fun and games.
It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
42
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 05:12:00 -
[30] - Quote
Strom Crendraven wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:So reality is; pos siphons will be used to shut down the small operators while those with most of the decent moons remain pretty much untouchable and are very likely to actually profit from this whole thing..
Well done CCP, you've given the major power blocks another foot hold on total domination of eve. By siphons being a real mechanic in the game, means it will create player traffic. This means the opportunity for combat increases. Any POS operators that rely on some 3rd party tool to play the game for them will be the ones to suffer the most. Any groups that actually inhabit the space they have POS in will be just fine as they will have eyes in the system to see when a siphon is deployed. I can't believe how heavily some groups rely on programs to play the game for them and go out of their way to make sure AFK game play and mechanics remain a thing for EVE. Pathetic. Except the siphon griefers will be in nulli interceptors or stabbed blockade runners or cloaky recons, generating rather indifferent volumes of combat. I also love they way you seem to think moon mining is AFK. I reckon a survey on player burn out in Eve would show two groups with the highest level of burn out being CEOs and POS monkeys, with FCs possibly being up there as well. I also find it ironic that a senior figure in NC., which has substantially outsourced the act living its own space, i.e. has gone beyond being AFK in its own space, is chastising people for running POS, which it thinks is AFK. Nerf NC burn out cloaky AFK nulli monkeys stabbed ironic POS siphon thingys!!!
What? Oh needs an animated gif to make sense. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
42
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 08:29:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Great enjoy emptying them every 25 hours, unless someone else empties it first. Passive fun and games. Do you really think there will be syphons that survive for 24hrs?? I'd be surprised if there were many lasted more than 12. But the poses are afkkkkkkk and passiveeeeee
The cognitive dissonance in this thread is approaching the levels of a creationist like Ray Comfort being confronted with samples from the Lenski e.coli experiments. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
42
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 11:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
Saeka Tyr wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: Hangon why if pos's are so passive do I need to spend on average 10hrs pw ( over half the average persons online time) managing my pos's?
other than "picking up materials that accumulated while sleeping" and "putting in more fuel", there really isn't much else for you to do.
These mythical self anchoring, assembling, linking and on-lining POS's whom do I acquire them off? It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 22:52:00 -
[33] - Quote
Omega Flames wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Saeka Tyr wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: Hangon why if pos's are so passive do I need to spend on average 10hrs pw ( over half the average persons online time) managing my pos's?
other than "picking up materials that accumulated while sleeping" and "putting in more fuel", there really isn't much else for you to do. These mythical self anchoring, assembling, linking and on-lining POS's whom do I acquire them off? those are available in rens. thou you might want to swing by amarr for the self-hauling-product-to-jita-and-fuel-back-from-jita ones and i hear tales that dodixie has a few that self-refine-alchemy.
Do that still have do that special on the self assembling POSs were if you buy 5 of them and 50 SOMER blink tickets, you get an Ishuknoe Watch Scorpion? It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 23:23:00 -
[34] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Mara Tessidar wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Mara Tessidar wrote:Frothgar wrote:So tell me, what incentive does Joe Schmoe have to pop a syphon, when it lets him take a resource his alliance was never going to share with him in the first place. Why am I not surprised a TriumvirateDOT guy is posting this? Why am I not surprised a Goonswarm FEDERATION guy is trying to make some Ad Hominem attack? First of all, no one gives a sh it what kind of fancy-pants Latin name an insult qualifies as. Secondly, in this case, it's entirely based on fact--Triumvirate was, like the original NC and others, corrupt and financially opaque. If you'd like to submit that Goonswarm Federation is "just as bad" you'll have to somehow get rid of our API-based finance spreadsheets that are public and convince everyone that we don't make money so that people can have fun. I'm sure you'll do a good job of that Marlona, just like you've done a good job convincing me that the siphons are not in fact going to be used precisely as every GSF/CFC/reasonably intelligent person in this thread has said. The fact you guys rely so heavily on API is why you guys are furious about having to actually have eyes out in your space to watch for the siphons. What can I say, but perhaps you guys should undock and go check them on your own initiative instead of waiting for some API finance team telling you what to do. Free will bro. Embrace it. 
Demands we patrol and watch our space, outsources living in his space to renters. Claims moons are passive AFK income, demands passive AFK module to grief them. Has bare facts pointed out to him, demands ISD stop Goons trolling him. Yup Marlona Sky, Cognitive Dissonance is your real name. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 00:11:00 -
[35] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I can't wait until the whine thread about these after Rubicon comes out "CCP goons are siphoning everyone's lowsec moongoo and nobody can make any isk anymore!" But according to you and your people, all the money is made in high sec off those evil mission runners. What changed all of the sudden where low sec was the source for all the income in the game?
Actually most goons and other sensible nullsec dwellers complain about the risk/reward balance of hi-sec, especially incursion runners and L4 mission runners.
These siphons seem to increase this inbalance. But, hey you are a one of these "grr goons, moons are passive income" meme spewers who is so skilled at Eve that he outsources living in his space, so what do you care or know? It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
45
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 11:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I can't wait until the whine thread about these after Rubicon comes out "CCP goons are siphoning everyone's lowsec moongoo and nobody can make any isk anymore!" But according to you and your people, all the money is made in high sec off those evil mission runners. What changed all of the sudden where low sec was the source for all the income in the game? Actually most goons and other sensible nullsec dwellers complain about the risk/reward balance of hi-sec, especially incursion runners and L4 mission runners. These siphons seem to increase this inbalance. But, hey you are a one of these "grr goons, moons are passive income" meme spewers who is so skilled at Eve that he outsources living in his space, so what do you care or know? But earlier you all were going on how the Siphon is the perfect griefer tool for Goons and CFC. Now suddenly it is the perfect tool for hi sec players. Did CCP make an update on the Siphon I missed? Please give us a link to this announcement. Thanks in advance. GÖÑ
I am sorry when did I say hisec pubbies would use this? When did I link mission and incursion runners with griefing nulsec moon mining? Oh, yeah I didn't. I did repeat that goons will use this to grief people because it is OP, which has been their repeated concern with these devices and mine. But seeing as the cognitive dissonance is strong in you i doubt you will read or respond to this. I wont hold you up, your leet caravan of courage is off to fight Solar Fleet, don't worry the renters will keep the home fires burning in your AFK passive income empire. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
45
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 02:41:00 -
[37] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:The whole idea was dead on arrival when it wasn't about fleet combat and timers. All this "nerf" does is change its pointlessness from malignant to benign (or less malignant really).
If you had to roll up, defang the pos, anchor and guard the siphon(s) while they onlined, and then come back the next day to haul away all the target PoS mod's moon, reaction, or alchemy goo, then you'd have a feature that generates actual fun conflict and content.
This structure spam and grind bullshit was dead before it started, all you can do with this framework is make it more or less awful.
I like this idea. A way to encourage interaction. Fascinating to see who dislikes. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
45
|
Posted - 2013.11.09 08:19:00 -
[38] - Quote
Verdis deMosays wrote:As a member of a small null alliance I love these changes. The siphons are an interesting idea and will be something I deploy on a regular basis with my Prowler. I think this will make for a lot more productive time gate camping too, since cloaky haulers will be in and out of null on a more regular basis to check on their little autonomous thieves. Also the Goon response has been priceless. Here's my reaction to it. http://www.ghostofthefuture.com/images/Ani2/UnfathomableSadness.gif
Seeing as goons message has consistently been "this is OP we will abuse it till it is nerfed and it will be the little guys that get screwed" I think you will find that goons = Cartman in that image. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
47
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 00:22:00 -
[39] - Quote
Verdis deMosays wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Verdis deMosays wrote:As a member of a small null alliance I love these changes. The siphons are an interesting idea and will be something I deploy on a regular basis with my Prowler. I think this will make for a lot more productive time gate camping too, since cloaky haulers will be in and out of null on a more regular basis to check on their little autonomous thieves. Also the Goon response has been priceless. Here's my reaction to it. http://www.ghostofthefuture.com/images/Ani2/UnfathomableSadness.gif Seeing as goons message has consistently been "this is OP we will abuse it till it is nerfed and it will be the little guys that get screwed" I think you will find that goons = Cartman in that image. Assuming you trust the opinion of the goonswarm, who have consistently shown themselves as an exploitive economic coalition. Honestly, if they are raising hell about how OP and unfair this is its a good sign to me that the existence of this item really worries them. The 74 pages of goon tears are pretty much proof of that. Assuming that CCP doesn't cave to the cries of the goons who control the majority of the moons worth anything I think the siphon will be a nice piratical way to break their hold on the T2 market. And before any goons or alts thereof start debating me on that, I'll just remind people of Hulkageddon and that time of GoonFun.
You seem to fail at reading and comorehending things. Failen Whalen above me has spelled it out for you, try reading his comment and comprehending it. |

Miner Hottie
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
47
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 11:21:00 -
[40] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Omega Flames wrote:Verdis deMosays wrote:Miner Hottie wrote:Verdis deMosays wrote:As a member of a small null alliance I love these changes. The siphons are an interesting idea and will be something I deploy on a regular basis with my Prowler. I think this will make for a lot more productive time gate camping too, since cloaky haulers will be in and out of null on a more regular basis to check on their little autonomous thieves. Also the Goon response has been priceless. Here's my reaction to it. http://www.ghostofthefuture.com/images/Ani2/UnfathomableSadness.gif Seeing as goons message has consistently been "this is OP we will abuse it till it is nerfed and it will be the little guys that get screwed" I think you will find that goons = Cartman in that image. Assuming you trust the opinion of the goonswarm, who have consistently shown themselves as an exploitive economic coalition. Honestly, if they are raising hell about how OP and unfair this is its a good sign to me that the existence of this item really worries them. The 74 pages of goon tears are pretty much proof of that. Assuming that CCP doesn't cave to the cries of the goons who control the majority of the moons worth anything I think the siphon will be a nice piratical way to break their hold on the T2 market. And before any goons or alts thereof start debating me on that, I'll just remind people of Hulkageddon and that time of GoonFun. who needs to trust goons? I don't trust them farther than i can throw an elephant, but I do trust the brain God gave me (since I actually use it unlike most of humanity) and the almost 2 decades of studying human behavior and almost as long studying economics. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out how difficult the logistics of attacking any of the large well defended null sec alliance's pos with these siphons is vs attacking any of the small not nearly as well defended low sec entities with them. Also by mentioning the hulkageddon you are literally making their point for them because the permageddon was the final catalyst to making ccp actually rebalance the exhumers so they were worth using again due to how easy they were to kill by suicide gankers. I'll give you 1 guess which side the goons were on during the permageddon. If you have a low sec POS you'll be fine. Check it regularly, get your stuff back then shoot the siphon. This will mainly affect big alliances with many moons. The little guy will be fine.
Cause 10 - 20% destroyed moon goo is nothing, you will recover all of the goo unless anyone else empties it and big alliances don't have 23.5/7 coverage of their space. It's all about how hot my mining lasers get. |
|
|